Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Cookie 'ajs_anonymous_id' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Page weighs 41.0 MB (30.7 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,126 investment → €9,169/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 22.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 19.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 4.3sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€20.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
- Multiple H1 headings (2 found)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€9.162 /mo
+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 3.24
Bandwidth Waste
€7,16 /mo
96616.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~9.7 MB per page loadSaves €7,16/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
14.03 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
22.43 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
4.32 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.016
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
14.03 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
30.90 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.28 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.01 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
822 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.048
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.77 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.03 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 41.0 MB (30.7 MB transferred)
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Uniform Digital Experience, on Atlassian Bitbucket, hosted on AWS, with AWS C...
Stack Architecture
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Statsig 3.12.0
Uniform Digital Experience 
Algolia 
Atlassian Jira HSTS 
HTTP/3 OneTrust 
Priority Hints 
React 
Sentry 
reCAPTCHA 
Atlassian Bitbucket 
Emotion 
Java 
Python 
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront 
AWS Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (20)
Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service for source code and development projects that use either Mercurial or Git revision control systems.
Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Python is an interpreted and general-purpose programming language.
Uniform Digital Experience is a digital experience platform (DXP) designed to manage, deliver, and optimize content and interactions across multiple digital channels.
Algolia offers a hosted web search product delivering real-time results.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.
reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Statsig is a modern product experimentation platform that helps product teams continuously measure impact of every single feature they launch.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Algolia) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/c2f2c0f7-2259-487e-bcc2-b365fe5502a1)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c2f2c0f7-2259-487e-bcc2-b365fe5502a1"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.atlassian.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.atlassian.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 13h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 41.0 MB (30.7 MB transferred)
- · Cookie 'ajs_anonymous_id' is missing the Secure flag
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+4Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source