Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-04 15:54 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
2.6m
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * with credentials — critical misconfiguration

ACAO '*' combined with Allow-Credentials is rejected by browsers — your CORS LOOKS permissive but credentialed requests fail silently.

Security › CORS Configuration
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page weighs 29.1 MB (8.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

790 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 21.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 21.2s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CAD 467 investment → CAD 8,311/month returns + CAD 350,000 risk avoided

Investment
CAD 467
4.9 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CAD 8,311
CAD 99,729/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+21252% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CAD 350,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CAD 870.0 mo payback · +114422% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CAD 87 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 21.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 18.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 14.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CA$467 4.9 developer hours at CA$95/hr
Quick wins
CA$87 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CA$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CAD 8,311 / month at risk ~CAD 99,729 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CAD 350,000

ACAPIPEDA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CAD 8,308 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CAD 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

CAD 2.76 /mo

25539.6 MB/mo × 0.108 CAD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.6 MB per page load
    Saves CAD 2.76/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

25
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

9.15 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

21.19 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

14.40 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

31.12 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

74.11 s

Desktop

60
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

628 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

711 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.51 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.73 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.72 s

Categories

8
Avg score 65.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

DataDome · 16 peers
You 66
·
Avg 72
-6 below average
0 50 100
Better than 6% of DataDome sites See full DataDome benchmark →
Amazon CloudFront · 419 peers
You 66
·
Avg 72
-6 below average
0 50 100
Performance P1Sustainability P1Content P2Security P7SEO P8Infrastructure P90Compliance P13Accessibility P15

Top 10% of Amazon CloudFront sites score 85+ on Performance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of Amazon CloudFront sites See full Amazon CloudFront benchmark →

Technology stack

DataDome, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN

5 technologies detected 3 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
DataDome
CDN
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront
Hosting
AWS Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-amz-cf-id: yHh-QaeUewfQjJom3ra0x8gUJSe90YTwcOJUF1nSbLQaD_GFJItLMA==

Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Hosting Website https://aws.amazon.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Header: X-Amz-Cf-Id

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

DataDome is a cybersecurity platform that specialises in bot protection and mitigation, offering advanced solutions to safeguard websites and mobile applications against malicious bot traffic, credential stuffing, scraping, and other automated threats.

Categories Security Website https://datadome.co Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (DataDome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/c46c536a-7eba-4443-891d-0eb32216ff9c)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c46c536a-7eba-4443-891d-0eb32216ff9c"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected C (76)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+9

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · Page weighs 29.1 MB (8.1 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * with credentials — critical misconfiguration

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 4h → C (76)
  • · 790 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback