Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 615ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (125ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1054ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
6 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€630 investment → €10,652/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 6.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 4.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.427 /mo
+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,14 /mo
1852.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~185 KB per page loadSaves €0,14/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.73 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.86 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
174 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.10 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.87 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
887 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.16 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
887 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.16 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
6 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap 3.1.0, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server, with cdnjs CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Bootstrap 3.1.0
Font Awesome Google Search Console 
Ionicons Morris.js 
Raphael 2.1.0
jQuery 1.10.2
PHP 
Apache Apache HTTP Server All Detected Technologies (13)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Ionicons is an open-source icon set crafted for web, iOS, Android, and desktop apps.
A JavaScript library that simplifies the process of creating interactive and responsive data visualizations on the web.
Raphael is a cross-browser JavaScript library that draws Vector graphics for websites.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (4)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 3.1.0. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 1.10.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/c74b8da2-ab89-4ed2-b2f1-968085a27f11)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c74b8da2-ab89-4ed2-b2f1-968085a27f11"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fworthmysite.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fworthmysite.orgExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (84)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 6 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found