Skip to content
CH · CHF (CHF) · Estimated Applicable regulations: nDSG/FADP Dev cost: CHF 130/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:14 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

3 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

125 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 7.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 7.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CHF 1,398 investment → CHF 13,139/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CHF 1’398
10.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
CHF 13’139
CHF 157’668/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11182% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CHF 250’000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CHF 8130.1 mo payback · +19305% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CHF 98 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.

Barriers
4
1 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+20pp
added vs baseline
Score
81
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 7.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CHF1,398 10.8 developer hours at CHF130/hr
Quick wins
CHF98 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CHF /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CHF 6’296 / month at risk ~CHF 75’549 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CHF 250’000

nDSG/FADP
  • No privacy policy link detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CHF 6’296 /mo

+19.7pp bounce · ~1,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CHF 3.20

Bandwidth Waste

CHF 0.22 /mo

3136.2 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~314 KB per page load
    Saves CHF 0.22/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.08 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.64 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

192 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.64 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.80 s

Desktop

90
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

840 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.87 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.071

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

840 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.90 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Astro · 54 peers
You 81
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Better than 83% of Astro sites See full Astro benchmark →
Open Graph · 3466 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P88Performance P86Content P84Compliance P80Sustainability P76Infrastructure P26Security P70SEO P58

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Astro

3 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Astro Open Graph Tailwind CSS

All Detected Technologies (3)

Astro is a new JavaScript-based static site builder.

Categories Static site generator, JavaScript frameworks Website https://astro.build Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://www.proton.me/_astro/FrameworkHead.astro_astro_type_script_index_0_lang.CkvChNH1.js

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 204 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Astro) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proton.me)](https://beavercheck.com/results/c93958bd-662a-e5c3-0ed1-61de9baf67e9)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c93958bd-662a-e5c3-0ed1-61de9baf67e9"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proton.me" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.proton.me

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 11h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 3 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 125 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback