Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
46 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cookie 'affinity' has no SameSite attribute
Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€513 investment → €10,041/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 11.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 8.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 11 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 331ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedRGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.816 /mo
+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,31 /mo
4130.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~413 KB per page loadSaves €0,31/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.95 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
11.02 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
331 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.95 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
11.02 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.41 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.89 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.41 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.89 s
Categories
8Performance
46 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
No <main> landmark found
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Adobe Experience Manager, on Java, with Fastly CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Tag Manager 
Kameleoon 
Adobe Experience Manager 
Adobe Client Data Layer 2.0.2Apple Facebook Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft 
OneTrust 
Qualtrics 
Vue.js 2.6.14
core-js 3.46.0
Java 
Fastly 
Imperva All Detected Technologies (16)
Imperva is a cyber security software and services company for networking, data, and application security.
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.
Adobe Client Data Layer is a framework of JavaScript objects on your site that contains all variable values used in your implementation.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.
Qualtrics is an cloud-based platform for creating and distributing web-based surveys.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Kameleoon is a personalisation technology platform for real-time omnichannel optimisation and conversion.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Client Data Layer) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Vue.js version may be outdated
Detected Vue.js 2.6.14. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/ca4239e2-ba6b-4a22-8903-6ead30b0a6b2)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ca4239e2-ba6b-4a22-8903-6ead30b0a6b2"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffairmont.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffairmont.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected C (78)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No <main> landmark found
- · 46 third-party resources (100% of weight)
- · Cookie 'affinity' has no SameSite attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found