Skip to content
NL · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: AVG · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €85/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:10 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
33.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 1078ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (43ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (2162ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
125ms
DNS 33ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
43ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
995ms
DNS 735ms · TLS 82ms
United States - Santa Clara
1475ms
DNS 1031ms · TLS 146ms
Singapore - Singapore
1666ms
DNS 1154ms · TLS 170ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
2162ms
DNS 1557ms · TLS 200ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 1078ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€623 investment → €5,168/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€623
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€5,168
€62,019/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9850% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.1 mo payback · +11574% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€28 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.

Barriers
9
9 warn
Bounce delta
+23pp
added vs baseline
Score
73
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 2.5s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 5ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€623 7.3 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€28 2 fixes in ~20 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€1,713,494 / month at risk ~€20,561,933 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20,500,000

AVGEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    AVG: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    AVG: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No headings found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5,161 /mo

+23.5pp bounce · ~2,346 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.10 /mo

1400.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~140 KB per page load
    Saves €0.10/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

95
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.09 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.50 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.049

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.09 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.50 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

689 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

800 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.035

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

689 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

800 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 79.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Plesk · 7 peers
You 81
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Better than 71% of Plesk sites See full Plesk benchmark →
Nginx · 956 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P91Content P14Sustainability P84Performance P83Accessibility P82Infrastructure P19SEO P21

Top 10% of Nginx sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 88% of Nginx sites See full Nginx benchmark →

Technology stack

Plesk, with Nginx CDN

2 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Minimal

Stack Architecture

Framework
Plesk
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (2)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Plesk is a web hosting and server data centre automation software with a control panel developed for Linux and Windows-based retail hosting service providers.

Categories Hosting panels Website https://www.plesk.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Plesk) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Minimal technology footprint

Only 2 technologies detected. This suggests a simple setup with minimal dependencies — excellent for performance and security.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvdwoude.eu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/cc94f526-7650-418c-878a-653df15644ca)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/cc94f526-7650-418c-878a-653df15644ca"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvdwoude.eu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvdwoude.eu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (85)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (88)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback