Skip to content
https://vnexpress.net Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
8
TTFB stable →
1.3s
FCP stable →
2.7s
LCP stable →
13.9s
Scanned
2026-08-28 14:25 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.4m
Vs prev
Improved by +7

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 908ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (171ms), slowest from Madrid (1304ms). No CDN detected. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1304ms
DNS 361ms · TLS 311ms
Singapore - Singapore
171ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 53ms
United States - Santa Clara
553ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 181ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1279ms
DNS 497ms · TLS 252ms
United Stated - New York
999ms
DNS 252ms · TLS 248ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1141ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 378ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 908ms · Cache: max-age=60

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

vnexpress.net fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 23.8 MB (16.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

2 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₫7,800,000 investment → ₫287,045,297/month returns + VND 100,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
₫7,800,000
13.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₫287,045,297
₫3,444,543,562/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+44061% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided VND 100,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₫7,500,0000.0 mo payback · +45827% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₫600,000 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
7
4 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
51
D
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
3
  • Page takes 13.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 10 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₫7,800,000 13.0 developer hours at ₫600000/hr
Quick wins
₫600,000 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₫281,935,803 / month at risk ~₫3,383,229,641 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

VND 100,000,000

PDPD
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    PDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000
  • 5 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    PDPD: VND 10,000,000 – VND 100,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

₫281,829,223 /mo

+32.2pp bounce · ~3,221 lost visitors/mo

CPC: VND 87500.00

Bandwidth Waste

₫106,580 /mo

53290.1 MB/mo × 2000.000 VND/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~5.3 MB per page load
    Saves ₫106,580/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

8
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.67 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.87 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.36 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

1.068

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

20.16 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

75.92 s

Desktop

49
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.35 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.03 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

101 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.176

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.25 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.94 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Funding Choices · 216 peers
You 77
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 87% of Funding Choices sites See full Funding Choices benchmark →
Google Font API · 1174 peers
You 77
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P95Sustainability P10SEO P90Accessibility P66Infrastructure P44Content P46Performance P53

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 57 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 68% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Funding Choices

21 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Criteo DoubleClick Floodlight Google Analytics Google Publisher Tag Google Tag Manager Prebid 11.28.0 PubMatic
Framework
Funding Choices Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft 365 Open Graph Priority Hints Swiper Three.js 128 VideoJS 7.2.2 Zepto jQuery 2.1.4

All Detected Technologies (21)

Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://developers.google.com/funding-choices Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=9l1kiLmHmqkUC82EVtzTQQza2ipNDpGSM2i66Sp66v4
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mailjet.com include:zcsend.net ip4:118.70.224.66 ip4:118.70.224.68 ip4:118.70.224.65 ip4:118.70.224.67 ip4:118.70.224.69 ip4:118.70.224.70 -all

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: vnexpress-net.mail.protection.outlook.com

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Three.js is a cross-browser JavaScript library and application programming interface used to create and display animated 3D computer graphics in a web browser using WebGL.

Categories JavaScript graphics Website https://threejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.

Categories Video players Website https://videojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://zeptojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://s1cdn.vnecdn.net/vnexpress/restruct/j/v9382/v3/production/libs/jquery-2.1.4.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Criteo provides personalised retargeting that works with Internet retailers to serve personalised online display advertisements to consumers who have previously visited the advertiser's website.

Categories Advertising, Retargeting Website https://criteo.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Advertising Website https://support.google.com/ds/answer/6029713?hl=en Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.

Categories Advertising Website https://developers.google.com/publisher-tag/guides/get-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-8DHKH6QPCD&cx=c&gtm=4e68q1

Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://prebid.org Detected by BeaverCheck

PubMatic is a company that develops and implements online advertising software and strategies for the digital publishing and advertising industry.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.pubmatic.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Funding Choices) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 2.1.4. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

21 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvnexpress.net)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/vnexpress.net)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/vnexpress.net"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvnexpress.net" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvnexpress.net

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · Page weighs 23.8 MB (16.9 MB transferred)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 2 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+5

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (88)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback