Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
5High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
0High impact, requires investment.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
6 image-only link(s) without alt text
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
119 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$142 investment → $3,540/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 14.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 12.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 4.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 4 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- No <main> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- No <nav> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$3,279 /mo
+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 1.16
Bandwidth Waste
$0.97 /mo
12147.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page loadSaves $0.97/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.79 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
14.65 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
4.24 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.043
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.61 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
26.93 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.13 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.66 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
522 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.085
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.22 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.65 s
Categories
8Performance
119 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Security
HSTS header is missing
Accessibility
6 image-only link(s) without alt text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Sustainability; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of WordPress sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
WordPress 6.9.4, on PHP, hosted on WordPress VIP, with Cloudinary CDN
Stack Architecture
All Detected Technologies (35)
Cloudinary is an end-to-end image- and video-management solution for websites and mobile apps, covering everything from image and video uploads, storage, manipulations, optimisations to delivery.
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
WordPress VIP is a managed hosting platform for WordPress.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.
FingerprintJS is a browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Osano is a data privacy platform that helps your website become compliant with laws such as GDPR and CCPA.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.
lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Marfeel is a publisher platform that allows publishers to create, optimise and monetise their mobile websites.
Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.
Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.
Observations (3)
WordPress detected — review security configuration
WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Fonts) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
35 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/cd7e33c3-f0aa-4cc8-a976-39ad400a4606)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/cd7e33c3-f0aa-4cc8-a976-39ad400a4606"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviewjournal.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviewjournal.comFix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
1 sprints · 1h total → projected B (80)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No <main> landmark found
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 6 image-only link(s) without alt text
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
- · 119 third-party resources (100% of weight)


