Skip to content
https://crpt.ru Export & share
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:35 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
47.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽4,375 investment → ₽331,625/month returns

Investment
₽4 375
1.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽331 625
₽3 979 495/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+90860% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽2 6250.0 mo payback · +151500% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 1.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 208ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽4,375 1.3 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽4,375 5 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽265 537 / month at risk ~₽3 186 444 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽265 437 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 105.45

Bandwidth Waste

₽100 /mo

13768.8 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page load
    Saves ₽100/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

83
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.07 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

208 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.52 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.07 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

436 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.25 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.01 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.25 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Ecommerce · 723 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 65% of Ecommerce sites
DDoS-Guard · 9 peers
You 75
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Better than 88% of DDoS-Guard sites See full DDoS-Guard benchmark →

Technology stack

DDoS-Guard, on PHP

6 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
1C-Bitrix
Framework
DDoS-Guard Masonry Swiper jQuery 3.4.1
Runtime
PHP

All Detected Technologies (6)

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

1C-Bitrix is a system of web project management, universal software for the creation, support and successful development of corporate websites and online stores.

Categories CMS, Ecommerce Website https://www.1c-bitrix.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

DDoS-Guard is a Russian Internet infrastructure company which provides DDoS protection, content delivery network services, and web hosting services.

Categories Security Website https://ddos-guard.net Detected by BeaverCheck

Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://masonry.desandro.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (DDoS-Guard) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrpt.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/cd98e7cc-bb53-494b-90d9-0c618c72e0d4)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/cd98e7cc-bb53-494b-90d9-0c618c72e0d4"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrpt.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrpt.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → B (81)
  • · Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag

Send Feedback