Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-28 12:21 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.6m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 393ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (37ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (636ms). Sucuri edge cache (HIT). Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
37ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 5ms
United Stated - New York
81ms
DNS 56ms · TLS 11ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
636ms
DNS 258ms · TLS 128ms
Spain - Madrid
607ms
DNS 132ms · TLS 25ms
Singapore - Singapore
497ms
DNS 216ms · TLS 96ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
502ms
DNS 214ms · TLS 99ms
CDN: Sucuri (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 393ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

usatf.org fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 23.1 MB (18.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

19 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

26 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

34 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 10.4s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$275 investment → $13,719/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$275
2.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$13,719
$164,630/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+59766% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1250.0 mo payback · +131604% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 10.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.2s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$275 2.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,669 / month at risk ~$104,027 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,664 /mo

+32.2pp bounce · ~3,221 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$4.67 /mo

58368.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~5.8 MB per page load
    Saves $4.67/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

24
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
62
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
77
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.15 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.41 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.18 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.212

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.29 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.49 s

Desktop

75
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
77
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
65
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
77
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

763 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

198 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.101

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.75 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.38 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Kentico CMS · 9 peers
You 77
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 66% of Kentico CMS sites See full Kentico CMS benchmark →
AccessiBe · 25 peers
You 77
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 60% of AccessiBe sites See full AccessiBe benchmark →

Technology stack

Kentico CMS, with Sucuri CDN

27 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Login Facebook Pixel 2.9.385 Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Lucky Orange StackAdapt
CMS
Kentico CMS
Framework
AccessiBe AccessiWay Adobe Fonts 1.21.0Apple Facebook Facebook SDK GSAP 1.18.0 Google Font API Google Workspace HTTP/3 Handlebars 4.7.8Microsoft 365 Microsoft ASP.NET Open Graph Swiper Tailwind CSS Typekit 1.21.0 core-js 3.41.0 jQuery 3.2.1
CDN
Sucuri

All Detected Technologies (27)

Sucuri is a cybersecurity company that provides website security solutions and services.

Categories CDN, Security Website https://sucuri.net/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Kentico CMS is a web content management system for building websites, online stores, intranets, and Web 2.0 community sites.

Categories CMS Website https://www.kentico.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AccessiBe is an accessibility overlay which claims to provide ADA and WCAG compliance. The system scans and analyzes a website, and applies adjustments which they claim make your website ADA and WCAG 2.1 compliant.

Categories Accessibility Website https://accessibe.com Detected by BeaverCheck

AccessiWay is a solution focused on digital accessibility and compliance for organizations seeking to meet established standards.

Categories Accessibility Website https://www.accessiway.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.adobe.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=mCEHt1RDWeL9hNvh
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=af3sys77em94gcvvrc67vuda9wlldu
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains connect.facebook.net: https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/bundle/sdk.js/

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Handlebars is a JavaScript library used to create reusable webpage templates.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://handlebarsjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: usatf-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 14 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Typekit is an online service which offers a subscription library of fonts.

Categories Font scripts Website https://typekit.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: //ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.2.1/jquery.min.js?v=26
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Facebook Login is a way for people to create accounts and log into your app across multiple platforms.

Categories Authentication Website https://developers.facebook.com/docs/facebook-login/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-Q286FMRQ1P&cx=c&_slc=1

Lucky Orange is a conversion optimisation tool with features including heatmaps, session recording, conversion funnels, form analytics, and chat.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.luckyorange.com Detected by BeaverCheck

StackAdapt is a platform that provides a content advertising strategy solution for planning, executing, and optimizing digital campaigns.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.stackadapt.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AccessiBe) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

27 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusatf.org)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/usatf.org)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/usatf.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusatf.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusatf.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · Page weighs 23.1 MB (18.6 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 19 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 26 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → B (86)
  • · 34 image(s) missing alt attribute

Send Feedback