Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-23 00:01 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
51.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

4 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

23 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€680 investment → €10,526/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€680
8.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€10.526
€126.308/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18475% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5950.1 mo payback · +21128% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
8
3 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
55
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • 14 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€680 8.0 developer hours at €85/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.214 / month at risk ~€86.573 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Multiple H1 headings (2 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 empty heading(s)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.214 /mo

+32.8pp bounce · ~3,279 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,12 /mo

1587.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~159 KB per page load
    Saves €0,12/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.16 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.66 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

164 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.49 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

916 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

916 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.08 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3868 peers
You 74
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Content P1Compliance P97Infrastructure P7Performance P89Security P18SEO P26Sustainability P73Accessibility P37

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 52% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2601 peers
You 74
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Content P1Compliance P96Infrastructure P6Security P11Performance P82SEO P22Accessibility P30Sustainability P67

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 37% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

8 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Modernizr 3.11.4 ZURB Foundation 5.5.3 jQuery 1.8.3 jQuery UI 1.9.0

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=KYB2dcEtU316bCgCI91EV0gPYVHUmTDY0vajbeqGSzo

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Zurb Foundation is used to prototype in the browser. Allows rapid creation of websites or applications while leveraging mobile and responsive technology. The front end framework is the collection of HTML, CSS, and Javascript containing design patterns.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://foundation.zurb.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: //www.dreamwidth.org/js/??jquery/jquery-1.8.3.js,foundation/vendor/custom.modernizr.js,foundation/foundation/foundation.js,foundation/foundation/foundation.topbar.js,dw/dw-core.js,jquery/jquery.ui.core.js,jquery/jquery.ui.widget.js,jquery/jquery.ui.tooltip.js,jquery.ajaxtip.js,jquery/jquery.ui.position.js,jquery.hoverIntent.js,jquery.contextualhover.js?v=1773454536
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-4FH9Y1TDGT

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.8.3. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdreamwidth.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/d01acce3-5c35-4d97-a0ed-58aedc202c46)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/d01acce3-5c35-4d97-a0ed-58aedc202c46"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdreamwidth.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdreamwidth.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → C (75)
  • · 23 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+7

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 8h → B (82)
  • · 4 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback