Audit overview
Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 image-only link(s) without alt text
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$875 investment → $12,390/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.
- Page takes 11.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 8.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- 48 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$150,000
- Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Heading level skipped: H3 → H5 (missing H4)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Heading level skipped: H3 → H5 (missing H4)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$8,502 /mo
+31.6pp bounce · ~3,161 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.44 /mo
5468.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~547 KB per page loadSaves $0.44/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.14 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
11.44 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.23 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.315
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.91 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
12.44 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.36 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.58 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
46 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.033
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.34 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.83 s
Categories
8Performance
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 image-only link(s) without alt text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 73+ on Accessibility; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Boomerang
Stack Architecture
Adobe Analytics 
Akamai mPulse 
Eloqua 
Tealium 
Boomerang 
Handlebars 4.7.7
Open Graph 
Prism Proofpoint 
ServiceNow 
TrustArc 
core-js 3.26.0
jQuery 3.6.1
jQuery UI 1.13.2All Detected Technologies (14)
boomerang is a JavaScript library that measures the page load time experienced by real users, commonly called RUM (Real User Measurement).
Handlebars is a JavaScript library used to create reusable webpage templates.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Prism is an extensible syntax highlighter.
ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.
TrustArc provides software and services to help corporations update their privacy management processes so they comply with government laws and best practices.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.
Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that enables companies to monitor, find, and fix website and application performance issues.
Eloqua is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform for marketing automation offered that aims to help B2B marketers and organisations manage marketing campaigns and sales lead generation.
Tealium provides a sales enterprise tag management system and marketing software.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Boomerang) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/sun.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/sun.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsun.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsun.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 9h total → projected B (83)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 image-only link(s) without alt text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found
- · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift