Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Performance, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 10.7 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
3 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$767 investment → $7,203/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.
- Page takes 16.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 13.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 989msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Thin contentUnder 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first→ Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Privacy Policy not detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- No <main> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$7,202 /mo
+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$1.24 /mo
15547.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.6 MB per page loadSaves $1.24/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.49 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
16.43 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
989 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.62 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
18.06 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
394 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.22 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
71 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.020
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.65 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.29 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 10.7 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
3 image(s) missing alt attribute
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 73 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Facebook SDK sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 73 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Facebook SDK, with Netlify CDN
Stack Architecture
Facebook Pixel 2.9.291
Plausible 
GSAP Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
Lodash 4.17.21NS1 
Open Graph Plausible Analytics 
Tailwind CSS 
Vue.js 
core-js 3.39.0
lit-element 4.2.1 lit-html 3.3.1
Netlify Netlify CDN All Detected Technologies (18)
Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.
GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.
lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Plausible is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Facebook SDK) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
18 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/d3221132-08bd-429f-89b0-09a09d0e1f30)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/d3221132-08bd-429f-89b0-09a09d0e1f30"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoolsuite.net" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpoolsuite.netExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (79)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 10.7 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+7Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 3 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found