Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-21 11:37 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 495ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (82ms), slowest from Singapore (1140ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
82ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 16ms
United States - Santa Clara
344ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 84ms
Spain - Madrid
475ms
DNS 40ms · TLS 110ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
364ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 92ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
563ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 140ms
Singapore - Singapore
1140ms
DNS 252ms · TLS 225ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 495ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

mirandawater.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

3 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

6 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CAD 499 investment → CAD 7,984/month returns + CAD 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CAD 499
5.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
CAD 7,984
CAD 95,805/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19109% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CAD 250,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CAD 4040.1 mo payback · +23629% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CAD 119 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 17.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 499ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CA$499 5.3 developer hours at CA$95/hr
Quick wins
CA$119 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CA$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CAD 7,984 / month at risk ~CAD 95,805 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CAD 250,000

ACA
  • 6 of 6 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CAD 7,983 /mo

+28.5pp bounce · ~2,851 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CAD 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

CAD 0.91 /mo

8411.0 MB/mo × 0.108 CAD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~841 KB per page load
    Saves CAD 0.91/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

43
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

12.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.60 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

499 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

12.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.73 s

Desktop

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

857 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

52 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.055

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.47 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 976 peers
You 80
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P21SEO P79Security P76Accessibility P70Sustainability P36Infrastructure P45Performance P50Content P50

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 72% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
Bootstrap · 1047 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P16SEO P82Security P81Accessibility P78Content P73Sustainability P41Infrastructure P59Performance P51

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

24 technologies detected 6 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Contact Form 7 Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Yoast SEO
CMS
WordPress
Framework
Bootstrap 5.1.3 Cloudflare Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace LazySizes MySQL Open Graph Priority Hints RSS SweetAlert2 Swiper YouTube core-js 3.39.0 jQuery 3.6.0 reCAPTCHA
Runtime
PHP
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (24)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://mirandawater.com/wp-content/cache/autoptimize/js/autoptimize_single_f3606e4db5e156a1b086bcfeb3b2d9b4.js?ver=476000
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: imani.ns.cloudflare.com

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=ACXWUGQQ-so49FZR-s8lM2AGttpjpenzPXHXtuvr-5g
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com

LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Performance Website https://github.com/aFarkas/lazysizes Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

SweetAlert2 is a JavaScript library that provides customisable, visually appealing, and responsive alert and modal dialog boxes for web applications.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://sweetalert2.github.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://mirandawater.com/wp-content/themes/mirandawater/assets/js/jquery.min.js?ver=3.6.0
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.

Categories Security Website https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google.com/recaptcha: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=6LeXxLwsAAAAAAMhLOrjarKjsoiNpfb7Hw21Im5T&ver=3.0

Contact Form 7 is an WordPress plugin which can manage multiple contact forms. The form supports Ajax-powered submitting, CAPTCHA, Akismet spam filtering.

Categories WordPress plugins, Form builders Website https://contactform7.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-KQRQZS7BX4

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

24 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmirandawater.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/mirandawater.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/mirandawater.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmirandawater.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmirandawater.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 3 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 6 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (88)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback