Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:21 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
54.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

6 categories need attention: Performance, and 5 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 16.6 MB (4.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 23.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 23.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CAD 641 investment → CAD 9,341/month returns + CAD 350,000 risk avoided

Investment
CAD 641
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CAD 9,341
CAD 112,097/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17381% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CAD 350,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CAD 5940.1 mo payback · +18779% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CAD 71 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 23.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 21.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 3.5s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CA$641 6.8 developer hours at CA$95/hr
Quick wins
CA$71 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CA$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CAD 9,341 / month at risk ~CAD 112,097 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CAD 350,000

ACAPIPEDA
  • 1 tracking cookie(s) set before user consent
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • 1 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interaction
    PIPEDA: CAD 1,000 – CAD 100,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ACA: CAD 250 – CAD 250,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CAD 9,340 /mo

+33.4pp bounce · ~3,336 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CAD 2.80

Bandwidth Waste

CAD 1.58 /mo

14624.4 MB/mo × 0.108 CAD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves CAD 1.58/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

1
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

17.82 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

23.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3.45 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

1.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

17.82 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

29.32 s

Desktop

48
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.33 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.45 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

291 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.33 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.51 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AngularJS · 454 peers
You 70
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Content P4Performance P7Sustainability P8Infrastructure P91Compliance P25Security P32Accessibility P53

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 81+ on SEO; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 12% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →
Cloudflare Bot Management · 475 peers
You 70
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Sustainability P2Content P5Performance P11Infrastructure P85Security P30Compliance P38Accessibility P56

Top 10% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 5% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites See full Cloudflare Bot Management benchmark →

Technology stack

AngularJS, with Cloudflare CDN

8 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
AngularJS Cloudflare Bot Management Cloudflare Turnstile Google Play app Google Search Console HTTP/3 Native app preferred
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (8)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/products/bot-management/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/b/0b8fb825cb67/api.js?onload=cFRiY3&render=explicit
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest related_applications includes Google Play app
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=NISbSmcIQumvbPjLbYAhRmzrx1LSAhRMH6XVaKTWxe0

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest prefer_related_applications is true

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclaude.ai)](https://beavercheck.com/results/d52e5c18-894e-453e-9b70-cf3d62675c97)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/d52e5c18-894e-453e-9b70-cf3d62675c97"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclaude.ai" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fclaude.ai

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 16.6 MB (4.6 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback