Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 330ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (53ms), slowest from Madrid (494ms). No CDN (document or assets).
Audit overview
Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
watsnaydouch.site fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
Page weighs 7.3 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$392 investment → $7,670/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 26.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 24.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Viewport disables user zoomVisitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk→ Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$150,000
- No <main> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- No <nav> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$7,669 /mo
+28.5pp bounce · ~2,851 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$1.21 /mo
15096.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page loadSaves $1.21/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
12.46 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
26.67 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
113 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
12.46 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
26.67 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
776 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.46 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.096
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
942 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.46 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 7.3 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Framer Motion, on Node.js, hosted on Express
Stack Architecture
Framer Motion 
Google Font API 
Lucide 
Open Graph 
Tailwind CSS 
Vite 
Node.js 
Express All Detected Technologies (8)
Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.
Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment that executes JavaScript code outside a web browser.
Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Vite is a rapid development tool for modern web projects.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Framer Motion) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/watsnaydouch.site)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/watsnaydouch.site"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwatsnaydouch.site" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwatsnaydouch.siteExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+8Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 7.3 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing