Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 333ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (38ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1539ms). AWS CloudFront edge cache (Miss from cloudfront). 1 location above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
accenture.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
4 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
26 third-party resources (54% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$1,450 investment → $10,601/month returns + USD 7,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.
- Page takes 13.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 10.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 8 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 468ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$7,500
- Privacy Policy not detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$9,095 /mo
+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 3.50
Bandwidth Waste
$0.72 /mo
9034.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~903 KB per page loadSaves $0.72/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.33 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
13.11 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
468 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
13.78 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
705 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.57 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
12 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.21 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.70 s
Categories
8Performance
is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
4 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Adobe Experience Manager, on Java, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN
Stack Architecture
Adobe Experience Platform Launch 
Leadfeeder 
Linkedin Insight Tag Adobe Experience Manager 
Adobe Client Data Layer 2.0.2 Adobe Dynamic Media Classic Amazon Route 53 Flickity 
GSAP HSTS 
LottieFiles 
OneTrust 
Open Graph 
Underscore.js 4.18.1
jQuery 1.12.4
lit-element 3.1.2 lit-html 2.1.2
Java 
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront 
Cloudflare 
cdnjs 
AWS Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (24)
Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.
Adobe Client Data Layer is a framework of JavaScript objects on your site that contains all variable values used in your implementation.
Adobe Dynamic Media Classic is a platform that enables customers to manage, enhance, publish, and deliver dynamic rich media content and personal experiences to consumers across all channels and devices, including web, print material, email campaigns, desktops, social, and mobile.
Flickity is a JavaScript slider library, built by David DeSandro of Metafizzy fame.
GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
LottieFiles is an open-source animation file format that's tiny, high quality, interactive, and can be manipulated at runtime.
OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.
lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.
Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.
Leadfeeder is a B2B visitor identification software that tracks and identifies companies that visit your website.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Client Data Layer) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 1.12.4. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
24 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/accenture.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/accenture.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.accenture.com%2Fde-de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.accenture.com%2Fde-deExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 4 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 26 third-party resources (54% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+4Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source