Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-11 11:58 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.0m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 600ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (287ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (815ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
287ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 4ms
United States - Santa Clara
374ms
DNS 219ms · TLS 14ms
United Stated - New York
675ms
DNS 620ms · TLS 4ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
668ms
DNS 475ms · TLS 5ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
815ms
DNS 555ms · TLS 5ms
Singapore - Singapore
784ms
DNS 149ms · TLS 175ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 600ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Cookie 'LBSERVERID' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 6.1s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,442 investment → $12,034/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$1,442
14.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$12,034
$144,414/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9917% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1,2250.1 mo payback · +11689% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,442 14.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,407 / month at risk ~$88,885 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,407 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.58 /mo

7256.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~726 KB per page load
    Saves $0.58/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

53
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.23 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

29 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.349

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.35 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.23 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.18 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.74 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.732

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.89 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.75 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AOS · 67 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 92% of AOS sites See full AOS benchmark →
Bootstrap · 903 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P3Security P94Accessibility P94Content P22Performance P77SEO P35Compliance P58Sustainability P54

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

AOS, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server, with Unpkg CDN

10 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Matomo Analytics Matomo Tag Manager PayPal
Framework
AOS Bootstrap HSTS HTTP/3
Server
Apache
CDN
Unpkg
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (10)

Unpkg is a content delivery network for everything on npm.

Categories CDN Website https://unpkg.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains unpkg.com: https://unpkg.com/aos@2.3.1/dist/aos.js
Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

JavaScript library to animate elements on your page as you scroll.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://michalsnik.github.io/aos/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Library Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Stylesheet: https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.7/css/bootstrap.min.css

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Matomo Analytics is a free and open-source web analytics application, that runs on a PHP/MySQL web-server.

Categories Analytics Website https://matomo.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Matomo Tag Manager manages tracking and marketing tags.

Categories Tag managers Website https://developer.matomo.org/guides/tagmanager/introduction Detected by BeaverCheck

PayPal is an online payments system that supports online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders.

Categories Payment processors Website https://paypal.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AOS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvlogxxx.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/d84697a8-b5b5-4c18-adc9-373963d424fb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/d84697a8-b5b5-4c18-adc9-373963d424fb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvlogxxx.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvlogxxx.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (85)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Cookie 'LBSERVERID' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → B (86)
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (89)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback