Skip to content
https://adhdreading.org Export & share
Scanned
2026-08-26 15:57 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 659ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (223ms), slowest from Santa Clara (943ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
943ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 14ms
Spain - Madrid
223ms
DNS 33ms · TLS 26ms
United Stated - New York
701ms
DNS 47ms · TLS 13ms
Singapore - Singapore
499ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 131ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
675ms
DNS 25ms · TLS 13ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
910ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 13ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 659ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 4

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

18 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 11.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 11.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€1,041 investment → €5,330/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€1.041
12.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€5.330
€63.961/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6043% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.1 mo payback · +11940% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€21 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 11.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 9.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 835ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€1,041 12.3 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€21 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.613 / month at risk ~€31.361 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.613 /mo

+24.3pp bounce · ~2,433 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,29 /mo

3974.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~397 KB per page load
    Saves €0,29/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

51
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.10 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.56 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

835 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.58 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

741 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.57 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

60 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.31 s

Categories

8
Avg score 87.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 636 peers
You 87
·
Avg 74
+13 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P97Security P96SEO P96Sustainability P96Performance P94Compliance P30Infrastructure P31Content P69

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4135 peers
You 87
·
Avg 74
+13 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95SEO P94Security P93Sustainability P90Performance P88Infrastructure P26Content P72Compliance P29

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, hosted on Next.js, with Cloudflare CDN

16 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Microsoft Clarity Umami
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Google Search Console HTTP/3 Lucide Open Graph Priority Hints Radix UI React Tailwind CSS Webpack shadcn/ui
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Next.js 15.5.12 Next.js App Router

All Detected Technologies (16)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://adhdreading.org/_next/static/chunks/4bd1b696-100b9d70ed4e49c1.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web servers Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app Detected by BeaverCheck

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Aba5pE_h1UBgaWogchN4SxlI-WPZqQE05JkLRs_hCko

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Radix UI is a React-based user interface component library that offers accessible, responsive, and customisable components for building web applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://www.radix-ui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 194 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.shadcn.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Umami is a self-hosted web analytics solution. It's goal is to provide a friendlier, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics and a free, open-sourced alternative to paid solutions.

Categories Analytics Website https://umami.is/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fadhdreading.org)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/adhdreading.org)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/adhdreading.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fadhdreading.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fadhdreading.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 12h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (89)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 12h → A (92)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
  • · 18 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback