Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
4 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.
External script from www.googletagmanager.com lacks integrity attribute
External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$325 investment → $15,560/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~39%.
- Page takes 8.2s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 5.7s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.8sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Mixed content on HTTPS pageBrowsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge→ Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- 4 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$10,611 /mo
+39.4pp bounce · ~3,945 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.30 /mo
3790.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~379 KB per page loadSaves $0.30/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.79 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
8.21 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.84 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.258
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.44 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
9.71 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
658 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.30 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
72 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.192
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
696 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.90 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 link(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Drupal sites score 92+ on Content; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Drupal 11, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Dynatrace Dynatrace RUM 
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Drupal 11
Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.3HSTS 
Lodash 1.13.7
Varnish 
jQuery 3.7.1
PHP 
Apache Apache HTTP Server All Detected Technologies (13)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.
Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Dynatrace is a technology company that produces a software intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence to monitor and optimise application performance and development, IT infrastructure, and user experience for businesses and government agencies throughout the world.
Dynatrace RUM is an AI powered, full stack, automated real user monitoring platform built by Dynatrace.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.3. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/d8d9fef8-97c6-4884-ac15-25f954c8c5eb)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/d8d9fef8-97c6-4884-ac15-25f954c8c5eb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhouse.gov" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhouse.govExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
- · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
- · External script from www.googletagmanager.com lacks integrity attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 4 control(s) without accessible label
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing