Skip to content
DK · DKK (kr) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: DKK 650/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:34 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
36.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Security, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'shell#lang' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 5

Page weighs 10.2 MB (8.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 9.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 9.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

DKK 4,225 investment → DKK 98,568/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
DKK 4.225
6.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
DKK 98.568
DKK 1.182.820/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+27896% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
DKK 2.2750.0 mo payback · +51892% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
DKK 325 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~39%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+39pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 9.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 966ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

kr4,225 6.5 developer hours at kr650/hr
Quick wins
kr325 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

kr /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

DKK 62.164 / month at risk ~DKK 745.963 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

DKK 62.150 /mo

+38.8pp bounce · ~3,884 lost visitors/mo

CPC: DKK 16.00

Bandwidth Waste

DKK 14 /mo

25379.0 MB/mo × 0.552 DKK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.5 MB per page load
    Saves DKK 14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

45
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.45 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.46 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

966 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.106

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.49 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.48 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

797 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.19 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

26 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.108

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.26 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.46 s

Categories

8
Avg score 68.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1279 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Content P8Sustainability P12SEO P13Accessibility P31Infrastructure P62Security P60Performance P50

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 12% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Facebook · 1422 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Content P7SEO P12Sustainability P15Accessibility P35Security P61Infrastructure P58Performance P52

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 14% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, on IIS, hosted on Microsoft IIS

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Apple Facebook Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 Windows Server
Server
IIS 10.0
Hosting
Microsoft IIS 10.0

All Detected Technologies (8)

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Server Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Microsoft-IIS/10.0
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=tsBU81BHloQSgFUI
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=1mfoe26jx4bn398v31k3b4s29uumxf
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=EvCzsCMkgSGV4vhVsWZEEQgbNTPef-aiT5ZdVsIfHW4
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms14099746
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: dtu-dk.mail.protection.outlook.com

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdtu.dk)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/dtu.dk)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/dtu.dk"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdtu.dk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdtu.dk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 10.2 MB (8.1 MB transferred)
  • · Cookie 'shell#lang' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback