Skip to content
https://feishu.cn Export & share
CN · CNY (¥) · Estimated Applicable regulations: PIPL Dev cost: ¥350/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 23:47 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.8m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 23.9 MB (8.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

12 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 37.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 37.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

¥2,363 investment → ¥90,555/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
¥2,363
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
¥90,555
¥1,086,654/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+45896% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CNY 50,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
¥2,1880.0 mo payback · +49576% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
¥263 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 37.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 35.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.3s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 40 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

¥2,363 6.8 developer hours at ¥350/hr
Quick wins
¥263 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

¥ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

¥90,555 / month at risk ~¥1,086,654 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

¥50,000,000

PIPL
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

¥90,539 /mo

+33.4pp bounce · ~3,336 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CNY 27.14

Bandwidth Waste

¥16 /mo

27314.2 MB/mo × 0.571 CNY/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.7 MB per page load
    Saves ¥16/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

25
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
73
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
77
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

28.04 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

37.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.28 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.134

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

28.04 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

43.65 s

Desktop

44
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
47
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
69
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

275 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.020

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.03 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.08 s

Categories

8
Avg score 67.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Axios · 28 peers
You 65
·
Avg 73
-8 below average
0 50 100
Babel · 102 peers
You 65
·
Avg 71
-6 below average
0 50 100
Better than 1% of Babel sites See full Babel benchmark →

Technology stack

Axios

10 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Sign-in Intercom
Build
Webpack
Framework
Axios Babel Google Search Console Microsoft Open Graph React 16.13.1 core-js 2.6.11

All Detected Technologies (10)

Promise based HTTP client for the browser and node.js

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/axios/axios Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Babel is a free and open-source transcompiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://babeljs.io Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=MMjIqjmOWnEQwp3mFZ-5OFlx2Uo_v1Segz6yKf01dZ8
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms26767525

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Sign-In is a secure authentication system that reduces the burden of login for users, by enabling them to sign in with their Google account.

Categories Authentication Website https://developers.google.com/identity/sign-in/web Detected by BeaverCheck

Intercom is an American software company that produces a messaging platform which allows businesses to communicate with prospective and existing customers within their app, on their website, through social media, or via email.

Categories Live chat, CRM Website https://www.intercom.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains widget.intercom.io: https://widget.intercom.io/widget/rlu6yajm
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://sf16-sg.larksuitecdn.com/obj/suite-public-file-sg/vendor/vendor.6b3fe94d8606.js

Observations (2)

React version may be outdated

Detected React 16.13.1. The current major version is 18. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeishu.cn)](https://beavercheck.com/results/db4fc7ae-cf38-4dfc-b30a-a2d212a916a7)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/db4fc7ae-cf38-4dfc-b30a-a2d212a916a7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeishu.cn" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffeishu.cn

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (75)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (72)
  • · Page weighs 23.9 MB (8.7 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 12 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (75)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback