Skip to content
https://esl-go.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-09-21 00:33 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
35.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Strong global performance — average 199ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (111ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (376ms). Document on Cloudflare; assets also on imgix.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
152ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 23ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
118ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 11ms
United Stated - New York
111ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 13ms
United States - Santa Clara
262ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 13ms
Singapore - Singapore
176ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
376ms
DNS 20ms · TLS 15ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 199ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

esl-go.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Warning: 5

14 third-party resources (45% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 3.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$425 investment → $4,521/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$425
4.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$4,521
$54,247/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12664% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$3750.1 mo payback · +14366% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.

Barriers
7
7 warn
Bounce delta
+20pp
added vs baseline
Score
79
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page loads in 3.7s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.2s over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$425 4.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$125 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$2,321 / month at risk ~$27,854 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$2,321 /mo

+20.0pp bounce · ~2,001 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$0.20 /mo

2464.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~246 KB per page load
    Saves $0.20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

86
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.61 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.67 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

20 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.61 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.26 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

790 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.038

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

790 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.26 s

Categories

8
Avg score 83.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 693 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Performance P95Sustainability P92Compliance P12Accessibility P81Security P78Content P29Infrastructure P64SEO P43

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Google Font API · 1263 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Performance P96Sustainability P91Compliance P12Accessibility P85Security P84Content P34SEO P43Infrastructure P57

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Cloudflare CDN

7 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Google Font API HTTP/3 Lucide Open Graph Tailwind CSS
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (7)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 166 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fesl-go.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/esl-go.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/esl-go.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fesl-go.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fesl-go.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A (90)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 14 third-party resources (45% of weight)
  • · 1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → A (91)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback