Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-15 05:48 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
53.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 431ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (68ms), slowest from Singapore (715ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
481ms
DNS 117ms · TLS 122ms
United Stated - New York
68ms
DNS 25ms · TLS 17ms
Spain - Madrid
432ms
DNS 123ms · TLS 104ms
United States - Santa Clara
300ms
DNS 91ms · TLS 72ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
588ms
DNS 340ms · TLS 87ms
Singapore - Singapore
715ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 231ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 431ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

blmc.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Server Response Intelligence
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€293 investment → €8,572/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€293
6.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€8.572
€102.858/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+35065% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2360.0 mo payback · +43438% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€23 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€293 6.5 developer hours at €45/hr
Quick wins
€23 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.947 / month at risk ~€71.359 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.946 /mo

+27.0pp bounce · ~2,703 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,26 /mo

3540.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~354 KB per page load
    Saves €0,26/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

65
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.11 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.33 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

94 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.181

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.53 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.34 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.79 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.041

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.34 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.12 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1266 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P97Compliance P7SEO P89Performance P88Sustainability P84Infrastructure P19Security P79Content P76

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1878 peers
You 84
·
Avg 74
+10 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P98Compliance P3SEO P93Infrastructure P13Performance P87Security P85Sustainability P80Content P75

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Nginx CDN

8 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Font API Google Workspace Lucide Open Graph Tailwind CSS Ubuntu shadcn/ui
CDN
Nginx 1.24.0

All Detected Technologies (8)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.24.0 (Ubuntu)
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: SMTP.GOOGLE.com

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 93 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.ubuntu.com/server Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://ui.shadcn.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblmc.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/blmc.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/blmc.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblmc.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fblmc.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Send Feedback