Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:28 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

13 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

13 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

13 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$850 investment → $11,928/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$850
8.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$11,928
$143,138/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16740% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$7500.1 mo payback · +18985% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 591ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$850 8.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,202 / month at risk ~$86,421 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,202 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.10 /mo

1282.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~128 KB per page load
    Saves $0.10/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.57 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.28 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

591 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.28 s

Desktop

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.38 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.38 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.38 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.38 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 74
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P10Sustainability P87Security P14Performance P84Content P17Compliance P20Accessibility P25Infrastructure P71

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 51% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Google Font API · 1019 peers
You 74
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
SEO P11Performance P88Content P13Sustainability P87Security P14Compliance P22Accessibility P23Infrastructure P65

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 52% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.8, on Perl, with Fastly CDN

12 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Plausible
Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.8 Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 Popper Tailwind CSS Varnish
Runtime
Perl
CDN
Fastly

All Detected Technologies (12)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-dfw-ktki8620050-DFW, cache-rtm-ehrd2290037-RTM

Perl is a family of two high-level, general-purpose, interpreted, dynamic programming languages.

Categories Programming languages Website https://perl.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://cdn.perl.org/perlweb/js/perlweb_bootstrap.min.js, Stylesheet: https://cdn.perl.org/perlweb/css/perlweb_bootstrap.min.css
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 5 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/plugins/ua/linkid.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-H3V42907P1&cx=c&gtm=4e6461h2

Plausible is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics.

Categories Analytics Website https://plausible.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.perl.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/dd0bae2c-fe77-e737-ca90-6f95fa589f7e)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/dd0bae2c-fe77-e737-ca90-6f95fa589f7e"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.perl.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.perl.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · 13 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 13 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (82)
  • · 13 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback