Skip to content
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:16 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
43.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£1,031 investment → £10,470/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£1,031
13.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£10,470
£125,641/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12083% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£9380.1 mo payback · +13302% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£56 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 297ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£1,031 13.8 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£56 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£5,782 / month at risk ~£69,387 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • No <nav> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£5,782 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.23 /mo

3631.2 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~363 KB per page load
    Saves £0.23/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

59
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.35 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

297 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.14 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.40 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

756 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.64 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.041

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

756 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.64 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Drupal · 367 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 61% of Drupal sites See full Drupal benchmark →
AngularJS · 454 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Content P4Infrastructure P14Compliance P35Sustainability P62Performance P61Security P42Accessibility P58

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 81+ on SEO; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 57% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →

Technology stack

Drupal 10, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

CMS
Drupal 10
Framework
AngularJS Cloudflare Turnstile HSTS
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.

Categories CMS Website https://www.drupal.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: X-Drupal-Cache present, Header X-Generator: Drupal 10 (https://www.drupal.org)
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/b/0b8fb825cb67/api.js?onload=cFRiY3&render=explicit

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.royal.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/results/dd7f43bc-b6a6-401a-86d6-9e508312033b)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/dd7f43bc-b6a6-401a-86d6-9e508312033b"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.royal.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.royal.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+4

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (82)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback