Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:57 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
2.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie '_2gis_webapi_session' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '_2gis_webapi_user' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie 'dg5_is_friends_clicked' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie 'dg5_srch_prm_ppp' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽14,000 investment → ₽111,880/month returns

Investment
₽14 000
4.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽111 880
₽1 342 562/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9490% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽12 2500.1 mo payback · +10860% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽3 500 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~19%.

Barriers
7
7 warn
Bounce delta
+19pp
added vs baseline
Score
79
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽14,000 4.0 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽3,500 4 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽111 880 / month at risk ~₽1 342 562 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽111 873 /mo

+18.6pp bounce · ~1,865 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽6,90 /mo

948.4 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~95 KB per page load
    Saves ₽6,90/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
77
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
0
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.29 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.29 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.48 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.29 s

Desktop

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
0
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

729 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

734 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.52 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

734 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 76.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Facebook · 1422 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Performance P99Content P7Sustainability P93Compliance P16SEO P20Security P27Infrastructure P36Accessibility P57

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 78% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3886 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Performance P96Content P10Sustainability P87SEO P17Compliance P19Security P29Infrastructure P36Accessibility P55

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 69% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Facebook, with Nginx CDN

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Facebook Google Search Console HSTS reCAPTCHA
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (5)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=m1aleocpeadqbtulztw839o5w6he82
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=r13K07PrqQbQR8tQcd93RqhW8dFKiJoup_gG7pxeZQE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.

Categories Security Website https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google.com/recaptcha: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2F2gis.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/dea9718c-6536-4376-a8aa-29bff7d0dfa1)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/dea9718c-6536-4376-a8aa-29bff7d0dfa1"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2F2gis.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2F2gis.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · Cookie '_2gis_webapi_session' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '_2gis_webapi_user' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'dg5_is_friends_clicked' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'dg5_srch_prm_ppp' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback