Audit overview
Accessibility and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
1 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
5 image-only link(s) without alt text
Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.
6 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
7 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
£300 investment → £3,729/month returns + GBP 17,550,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 14.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 11.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 530ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
£17,550,000
- 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Multiple <main> landmarks (4 found)Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
- 3 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeledEquality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
£3,019 /mo
+28.7pp bounce · ~2,875 lost visitors/mo
CPC: GBP 1.05
Bandwidth Waste
£0.51 /mo
8112.0 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~811 KB per page loadSaves £0.51/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.76 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
14.08 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
530 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.039
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.57 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
754 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.30 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
14 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.031
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.11 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.53 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 73+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Facebook, hosted on GoDaddy, with AWIN CDN
Stack Architecture
All Detected Technologies (20)
AWIN is a global affiliate marketing network.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Remix is a React framework used for server-side rendering (SSR).
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Shopify is a subscription-based software that allows anyone to set up an online store and sell their products. Shopify store owners can also sell in physical locations using Shopify POS, a point-of-sale app and accompanying hardware.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
React Router provides declarative routing for React.
Smarter Click is a marketing technology company.
Envolve Tech is a platform that provides virtual shopping assistants designed to guide customers through online purchases.
Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.
Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (3)
Shopify storefront detected
Shopify handles hosting, SSL, and CDN automatically. Performance optimizations focus on theme code, app scripts, and image optimization. Check the Performance tab for third-party script impact.
No build tool detected
A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
20 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/defa1353-866c-4759-abc3-5507f19de868)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/defa1353-866c-4759-abc3-5507f19de868"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhiutdenim.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhiutdenim.co.ukFix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (78)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 5 image-only link(s) without alt text
- · 6 link(s) with no accessible text
- · 7 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute


