Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 33.4 MB (29.3 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
8 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€608 investment → €14,686/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 9.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 7.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 41 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€9.914 /mo
+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 3.20
Bandwidth Waste
€6,82 /mo
92086.6 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~9.2 MB per page loadSaves €6,82/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.55 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
9.72 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.22 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.036
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.92 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
14.33 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
989 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.87 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
41 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.076
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.17 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.00 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 33.4 MB (29.3 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
8 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bulma sites score 88+ on Sustainability; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 84+ on Sustainability; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bulma, on TypeScript, hosted on Snowplow Analytics
Stack Architecture
Optimizely 
PayPal 
Varify 
Bulma 
Glide.js Microsoft Microsoft 365 
RSS 
SolidJS 
Tailwind CSS 
Vike 
Vite 
Webpack 
core-js 3.10.2
TypeScript 
Snowplow Analytics All Detected Technologies (16)
Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.
TypeScript is an open-source language which builds on JavaScript by adding static type definitions.
Glide.js is a dependency-free JavaScript ES6 slider and carousel.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
SolidJS is a purely reactive library. It was designed from the ground up with a reactive core. It's influenced by reactive principles developed by previous libraries.
Vike is a framework that enhances Vite applications with server-side rendering (SSR) and static site generation (SSG) capabilities, allowing for flexible integration and progressive enhancement.
Vite is a rapid development tool for modern web projects.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Optimizely is an experimentation platform that helps developers build and run A/B tests on websites.
PayPal is an online payments system that supports online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders.
Varify is an A/B testing platform that provides traffic flat rates for data-driven web page optimization aimed at increasing conversions.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bulma) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/df1a4423-deb1-4ba8-90ec-1c794e4f7b0b)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/df1a4423-deb1-4ba8-90ec-1c794e4f7b0b"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchip.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchip.deExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 33.4 MB (29.3 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 8 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+4Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found