Audit overview
Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
1High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
4High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 5.0 MB (5.0 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
2 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
4 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€723 investment → €6,529/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.
- Page takes 21.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 18.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 101 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 368ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 2 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedAVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundAVG: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundAVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.528 /mo
+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€1,17 /mo
15776.6 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.6 MB per page loadSaves €1,17/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.16 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
21.09 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
368 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.085
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.16 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
24.90 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.68 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.56 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
39 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.057
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.69 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 5.0 MB (5.0 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
2 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 49 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Kontent.ai
Stack Architecture
Google Tag Manager 
Kontent.ai 
Font Awesome 
Foundation Google Search Console HSTS 
Htmx 2.0.4Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Open Graph 
Quill 
Underscore.js 4.17.21
Vue.js ZURB Foundation 6.7.5
core-js 3.19.3
jQuery 3.6.0All Detected Technologies (18)
Kontent.ai is a SaaS-based modular content platform.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Htmx is a JavaScript library for performing AJAX requests, triggering CSS transitions, and invoking WebSocket and server-sent events directly from HTML elements.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Quill is a free open-source WYSIWYG editor.
Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.
Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.
Zurb Foundation is used to prototype in the browser. Allows rapid creation of websites or applications while leveraging mobile and responsive technology. The front end framework is the collection of HTML, CSS, and Javascript containing design patterns.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (3)
jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework
Both jQuery and Vue.js are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
18 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/df402815-a81e-4fa9-b1fd-5121d3d20332)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/df402815-a81e-4fa9-b1fd-5121d3d20332"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvu.nl" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvu.nlExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (84)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 5.0 MB (5.0 MB transferred)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+8Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 control(s) without accessible label
- · 4 image(s) missing alt attribute
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found