Skip to content
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-13 16:56 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 327ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (53ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (596ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
116ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 26ms
United Stated - New York
299ms
DNS 84ms · TLS 73ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
53ms
DNS 20ms · TLS 14ms
United States - Santa Clara
418ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 138ms
Singapore - Singapore
479ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 159ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
596ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 198ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 327ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

5 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

7 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£600 investment → £10,160/month returns + GBP 17,550,000 risk avoided

Investment
£600
8.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£10,160
£121,916/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20219% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 17,550,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£5250.1 mo payback · +23122% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~24%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+24pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • 7 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£600 8.0 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£75 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

£1,467,549 / month at risk ~£17,610,591 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£17,550,000

UK GDPREquality Act 2010
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • 1 heading(s) are over 120 characters -- likely a misformatted paragraph
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£5,049 /mo

+24.0pp bounce · ~2,404 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.37 /mo

5877.4 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~588 KB per page load
    Saves £0.37/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.19 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.69 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

186 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.40 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

484 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

890 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.39 s

Categories

8
Avg score 86.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 755 peers
You 85
·
Avg 74
+11 above average
0 50 100
Security P97Accessibility P97SEO P90Performance P82Sustainability P80Compliance P38Content P61Infrastructure P48

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 85
·
Avg 73
+12 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Accessibility P97SEO P90Sustainability P83Content P81Performance P80Infrastructure P64Compliance P48

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 99% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on LiteSpeed/PHP

22 technologies detected 5 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Google Ads Google Ads Conversion Tracking LiteSpeed Cache Microsoft Clarity Yoast SEO
CMS
WordPress
Framework
Bootstrap 5Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft Microsoft 365 MySQL Open Graph Popper Priority Hints Tailwind CSS Trustpilot jQuery 3.7.1
Runtime
PHP
Server
LiteSpeed

All Detected Technologies (22)

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://tkpg.co.uk/wp-content/litespeed/js/44bfa55326615bf29f3fb9c3180bb457.js?ver=bb457, Script URL: https://tkpg.co.uk/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js, Link URL: https://tkpg.co.uk/wp-content/themes/tkpg-2025/dist/fonts/Gotham-subset/Gotham-Book-subset.woff2, Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: //widget.trustpilot.com/bootstrap/v5/tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=9WECGkkcgS_1MiXnDgeSn2AVRRp2a6tNdFDBsSK0_8k

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms13505749
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: tkpg-co-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 64 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Trustpilot is a Danish consumer review website which provide embed stand-alone applications in your website to show your most recent reviews, TrustScore, and star ratings.

Categories Reviews Website https://business.trustpilot.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains widget.trustpilot.com: //widget.trustpilot.com/bootstrap/v5/tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://tkpg.co.uk/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.

Categories Analytics Website https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/1722022 Detected by BeaverCheck

LiteSpeed Cache is an all-in-one site acceleration plugin for WordPress.

Categories Caching, WordPress plugins Website https://www.litespeedtech.com/products/cache-plugins/wordpress-acceleration Detected by BeaverCheck

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

22 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftkpg.co.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/results/dff5ea2c-de66-4d9a-8eb1-7c65310a4602)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/dff5ea2c-de66-4d9a-8eb1-7c65310a4602"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftkpg.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftkpg.co.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · 5 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 7 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → A (92)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback