Skip to content
https://www.dhiveennatural.in Export & share
IN · INR (₹) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DPDP Act Dev cost: ₹1,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-10-09 19:53 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
53.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Excellent global latency — average 58ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (30ms), slowest from Madrid (103ms). Document and assets on Cloudflare. Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
103ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
62ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
47ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 15ms
United States - Santa Clara
47ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 19ms
Singapore - Singapore
30ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
61ms
DNS 21ms · TLS 14ms
CDN: Cloudflare · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 58ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

dhiveennatural.in fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page weighs 32.2 MB (31.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 17.2s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 17.2s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₹6,625 investment → ₹1,438/month returns

Investment
₹6,625
4.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₹1,438
₹17,254/yr
Payback
4.6 mo
+160% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₹6,375 → 4.4 mo payback · +171% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₹625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 17.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 209ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₹6,625 4.4 developer hours at ₹1500/hr
Quick wins
₹625 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

₹ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₹1,438 / month at risk ~₹17,254 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₹775 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: INR 0.25

Bandwidth Waste

₹663 /mo

99492.4 MB/mo × 6.667 INR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~9.9 MB per page load
    Saves ₹663/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

45
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.17 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.16 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

209 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.490

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.17 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

17.59 s

Desktop

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.33 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.65 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.398

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.71 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 731 peers
You 79
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Content P12Security P77Accessibility P71Performance P70Infrastructure P31SEO P32Sustainability P35Compliance P41

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 69% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Priority Hints · 2287 peers
You 79
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Content P9Infrastructure P21Sustainability P28SEO P30Security P69Compliance P33Accessibility P62Performance P55

Top 10% of Priority Hints sites score 97+ on Content; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 60% of Priority Hints sites See full Priority Hints benchmark →

Technology stack

Priority Hints, with Cloudflare CDN

5 technologies detected 4 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Priority Hints
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (5)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-KH6Y21VXGZ

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Priority Hints) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dhiveennatural.in)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/dhiveennatural.in)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/dhiveennatural.in"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dhiveennatural.in" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dhiveennatural.in

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 32.2 MB (31.6 MB transferred)
  • · No H1 heading found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback