Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 23:17 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
2.9m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 4

167 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

168 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 18.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 18.6s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,017 investment → $8,973/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$1,017
10.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,973
$107,681/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+10492% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6170.1 mo payback · +17362% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$17 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 18.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 16.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.8s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,017 10.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$17 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,973 / month at risk ~$107,681 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,973 /mo

+33.4pp bounce · ~3,336 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.51 /mo

6409.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~641 KB per page load
    Saves $0.51/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 73.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1019 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P3Content P8Security P88Infrastructure P13Compliance P13Sustainability P85Accessibility P83Performance P51

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 48% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Apollo · 46 peers
You 73
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 41% of Apollo sites See full Apollo benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, on GraphQL, hosted on Platform.sh, with Fastly CDN

11 technologies detected 5 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
New Relic
Framework
Amazon Route 53 Apollo 3.7.1Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365 Open Graph
Runtime
GraphQL
CDN
Fastly
Hosting
Platform.sh

All Detected Technologies (11)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-sin-wsat1880028-SIN, cache-sin-wsat1880028-SIN
Categories PaaS Website https://platform.sh Detected by BeaverCheck

GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for fulfilling those queries with your existing data.

Categories Programming languages Website https://graphql.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1110.awsdns-10.org

Apollo is a fully-featured caching GraphQL client with integrations for React, Angular, and more.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://www.apollographql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=x6L-Npwz2mFkkNi_hZT3MyNqUeFh5137L-m03wOwXhU

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms68802650
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: veralto-com.mail.protection.outlook.com

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

New Relic is a SaaS offering that focuses on performance and availability monitoring.

Categories RUM Website https://newrelic.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpantone.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/pantone.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/pantone.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpantone.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpantone.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 10h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (75)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 167 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 168 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback