Skip to content
https://capfi.fr Export & share
FR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-29 20:01 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
50.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 532ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (57ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1043ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
117ms
DNS 44ms · TLS 27ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
57ms
DNS 25ms · TLS 16ms
United Stated - New York
401ms
DNS 165ms · TLS 84ms
United States - Santa Clara
747ms
DNS 309ms · TLS 150ms
Singapore - Singapore
828ms
DNS 328ms · TLS 171ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1043ms
DNS 418ms · TLS 213ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 532ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 2

15 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

4 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Warning: 4

4 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 3.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your search visibility.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 3.6s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€320 investment → €4,664/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€320
4.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€4.664
€55.969/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17390% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2400.1 mo payback · +23221% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€80 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

3 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~13%.

Barriers
3
3 warn
Bounce delta
+13pp
added vs baseline
Score
91
A
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 3.6s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.1s over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€320 4.0 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€80 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.240 / month at risk ~€38.878 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.240 /mo

+13.0pp bounce · ~1,296 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.50

Bandwidth Waste

€0,09 /mo

1265.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~127 KB per page load
    Saves €0,09/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.76 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.56 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

8 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.164

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.68 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

503 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

543 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.060

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

631 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

544 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 86.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3966 peers
You 87
·
Avg 74
+13 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Compliance P5Accessibility P95Performance P90Sustainability P84Content P83SEO P58Infrastructure P44

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1812 peers
You 87
·
Avg 74
+13 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Compliance P4Accessibility P96Performance P89Content P83Sustainability P80Infrastructure P36SEO P60

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 99% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, hosted on OVH

7 technologies detected 2 stack layers Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft Open Graph
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (7)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns10.ovh.net
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=rgYtrTWDSvB25fmHeLRyRpjGjkk8jwvfxdxD9w631Go
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 include:mx.ovh.com include:spf.cloud.vadesecure.com include:_spf.google.com include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io include:145019261.spf06.hubspotemail.net include:spf.veryswing.com -all

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms16579742

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcapfi.fr)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/capfi.fr)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/capfi.fr"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcapfi.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcapfi.fr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 15 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · 4 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 3h → A (92)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · 4 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback