Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:05 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

External script from cmp.nature.com lacks integrity attribute

External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.

Security › Subresource Integrity
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€659 investment → €10,120/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€659
7.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€10.120
€121.440/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18335% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5950.1 mo payback · +20310% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
3
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 593ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€659 7.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.687 / month at risk ~€92.246 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 2 empty heading(s)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.687 /mo

+34.9pp bounce · ~3,494 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,33 /mo

4408.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~441 KB per page load
    Saves €0,33/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.18 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.94 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

593 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.190

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.18 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.38 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

657 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.21 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

4 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.058

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.01 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.66 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2556 peers
You 76
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Security P7Accessibility P90Sustainability P84Compliance P83Performance P68Content P39SEO P43

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 56% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1498 peers
You 76
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Accessibility P90Security P14Compliance P85Sustainability P76Performance P60Content P45SEO P52

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 97+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 53% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, hosted on Google Cloud, with Fastly CDN

9 technologies detected 4 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Tag Manager Zipkin
Framework
HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph RSS Varnish
CDN
Fastly
Hosting
Google Cloud

All Detected Technologies (9)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-toj-leto2350079-TOJ, cache-toj-leto2350050-TOJ
Categories Hosting Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Via header contains google

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MRVXSHQ&gtg_health=1
Categories Analytics Website https://zipkin.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/e3a7e0f2-977e-f8d8-78c6-7d83a96f1379)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/e3a7e0f2-977e-f8d8-78c6-7d83a96f1379"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (78)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
  • · External script from cmp.nature.com lacks integrity attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback