Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 728ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (229ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1190ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
9 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
1 font preload(s) missing `crossorigin` -- font will be downloaded twice
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
116 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
6 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.
6 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
₽23,625 investment → ₽310,878/month returns
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.
- Page takes 5.8s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 41 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Bounce-Rate Cost
₽247 386 /mo
+23.5pp bounce · ~2,346 lost visitors/mo
CPC: RUB 105.45
Bandwidth Waste
₽31 /mo
4314.6 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~431 KB per page loadSaves ₽31/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.01 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.81 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
90 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.64 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.06 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
332 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
835 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.066
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.02 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
849 ms
Categories
8Performance
1 font preload(s) missing `crossorigin` -- font will be downloaded twice
Security
116 inline style attribute(s) detected
Accessibility
9 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Debian, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Cart Functionality 
Debian HSTS 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
PHP 
Apache 2.4.67 Apache HTTP Server 2.4.67All Detected Technologies (8)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Debian is a Linux software which is a free open-source software.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Observations (3)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.67'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Debian) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/e962dd87-5e08-4ff0-94fe-2436fa682232)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/e962dd87-5e08-4ff0-94fe-2436fa682232"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsvoyaaptechka.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsvoyaaptechka.ruExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 9 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 6 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
- · 6 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 font preload(s) missing `crossorigin` -- font will be downloaded twice
- · 116 inline style attribute(s) detected