Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Page weighs 23.3 MB (19.9 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
118 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
119 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$517 investment → $14,736/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.
- Page takes 9.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 7.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.4sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$9,215 /mo
+34.3pp bounce · ~3,426 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$5.01 /mo
62583.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~6.3 MB per page loadSaves $5.01/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.77 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
9.68 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.44 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.346
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.70 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
17.19 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.66 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
5.61 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
84 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.371
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.28 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.63 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 23.3 MB (19.9 MB transferred)
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 86+ on Sustainability; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Adobe Experience Manager, on Apache/Java, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Facebook Pixel 2.9.303
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Mautic 
Outbrain 
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement 
Siteimprove 
Adobe Experience Manager 
Bootstrap 3.3.5Facebook SDK Google Workspace HSTS Masonry Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Modernizr 2.8.3
Moment.js 2.22.2
Open Graph 
OpenSSL 1.1.1k
core-js 3.32.2
jQuery 1.11.3
Java 
Apache 2.4.37 Apache HTTP Server 2.4.37All Detected Technologies (26)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.
Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.
Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
OpenSSL is a software library for applications that secure communications over computer networks against eavesdropping or need to identify the party at the other end.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Mautic is a free and open-source marketing automation tool for Content Management, Social Media, Email Marketing, and can be used for the integration of social networks, campaign management, forms, questionnaires, reports, etc.
Outbrain is a web advertising platform that displays boxes of links, known as chumboxes, to pages within websites.
Salesforce Marketing Cloud Account Engagement (formerly known as Pardot) is an application specifically designed for B2B marketing automation.
Siteimprove is a digital analytics and content QA platform.
Observations (5)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.37'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 3.3.5. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 1.11.3. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
26 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/e9c8c902-24c1-4145-990d-c34d1c294e88)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/e9c8c902-24c1-4145-990d-c34d1c294e88"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fudel.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fudel.eduExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 5h total → projected C (78)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 23.3 MB (19.9 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · 118 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · 119 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing