Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 883ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (334ms), slowest from Singapore (1703ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.
2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,233 investment → €5,717/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.
- Page takes 17.1s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 14.6s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 385ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€20,500,000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- Privacy Policy not detectedGDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeledEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- Multiple H1 headings (2 found)EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€5,717 /mo
+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0.63 /mo
8494.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~849 KB per page loadSaves €0.63/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
6.28 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
17.08 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
385 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.32 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
17.10 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.13 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.13 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.002
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.47 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.13 s
Categories
8Performance
2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Font API
Stack Architecture
Google Font API 
Open Graph 
lit-element 4.2.2 lit-html 3.3.2All Detected Technologies (4)
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.
lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/e9fa2538-b5b7-4ec6-897c-62af43f7cadb)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/e9fa2538-b5b7-4ec6-897c-62af43f7cadb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fabsound.ie" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fabsound.ieExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (87)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+2Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source