Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Excellent global latency — average 69ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (13ms), slowest from Santa Clara (145ms). Assets on Vercel (host www.brickyard.ae, 3 assets); document served directly from origin (Google).
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Compliance, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
10 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
Page weighs 9.1 MB (8.5 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$425 investment → $7,541/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 15.6s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 13.1s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Privacy Policy not detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$7,539 /mo
+28.0pp bounce · ~2,803 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$2.14 /mo
26782.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.7 MB per page loadSaves $2.14/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.17 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
15.64 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
64 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.94 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
16.78 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
826 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.46 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.08 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.50 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 9.1 MB (8.5 MB transferred)
Security
10 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Framer Motion, on Turbopack, hosted on Next.js
Stack Architecture
Framer Motion Google Domains 
HTTP/3 
Lenis 1.1.4
Lucide 
Priority Hints 
React 
Tailwind CSS 
Webpack 
Turbopack 
Next.js 16.3.6 Next.js App Router All Detected Technologies (12)
Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.
The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.
Turbopack is an incremental bundler for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust and integrated into the Next.js framework for optimized build performance.
Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Lenis is a smooth scroll library to normalise the scrolling experience across devices.
Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Framer Motion) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/share.google)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/share.google"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.google%2FU54px4anxc5wgUpxN" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshare.google%2FU54px4anxc5wgUpxNExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+8Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 9.1 MB (8.5 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 10 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing