Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 477ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (36ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (918ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)
Plain-HTTP sites leak everything — credentials, session cookies, browsing history — to anyone on the network path.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
11 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$575 investment → $8,769/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.
- Site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers show "Not Secure" in the URL bar — visitors abandon before reading→ Install a TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt is free) and redirect HTTP → HTTPS
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no privacy policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- No <main> landmark foundADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$8,769 /mo
+32.6pp bounce · ~3,260 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.08 /mo
957.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~96 KB per page loadSaves $0.08/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
0 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
0 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
0 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
0 ms
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.29 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
7.22 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
214 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.55 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.29 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)
Accessibility
1 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap 5.0.2, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Bootstrap 5.0.2
Font Awesome 
Isotope 
MDBootstrap Masonry 
Moment.js 2.18.1
Select2 Skrollr 0.6.26
Swiper 
Tailwind CSS 
YouTube 
core-js 3.9.0
jQuery 3.7.1
Apache Apache HTTP Server 
GoDaddy All Detected Technologies (18)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Isotope.js is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to sort, filter, and add Masonry layouts to items on a webpage.
MDBootstrap (Material Design for Bootstrap) is a complete UI package that can be integrated with other frameworks such as Angular, React, Vue, etc. It is used to design a fully responsive and mobile-friendly layout using various components, plugins, animation.
Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.
Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.
Select2 is a jQuery based replacement for select boxes. It supports searching, remote data sets, and infinite scrolling of results.
Skrollr is a JavaScript library supporting parallax scrolling on mobile and desktop platforms in a compact 12k minified size.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
18 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/teenaadentalcare.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/teenaadentalcare.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2FTeenaadentalcare.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2FTeenaadentalcare.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 11 link(s) with no accessible text
- · Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 1 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing