Skip to content
https://www.webtechnepal.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-11-04 04:02 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.6m
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

webtechnepal.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

15 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 4

4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
Warning: 5

65 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 4.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.5s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€1,530 investment → €4,212/month returns

Investment
€1.530
18.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€4.212
€50.547/yr
Payback
0.4 mo
+3204% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€1.190 → 0.3 mo payback · +4148% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~19%.

Barriers
2
1 crit 1 warn
Bounce delta
+19pp
added vs baseline
Score
87
A
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
0
  • Page takes 4.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€1,530 18.0 developer hours at €85/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.003 / month at risk ~€24.035 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.003 /mo

+18.6pp bounce · ~1,865 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,23 /mo

3142.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~314 KB per page load
    Saves €0,23/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.16 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

78 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.50 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.17 s

Desktop

95
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

739 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.38 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.38 s

Categories

8
Avg score 89.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WooCommerce · 277 peers
You 89
·
Avg 79
+10 above average
0 50 100
Better than 96% of WooCommerce sites See full WooCommerce benchmark →
Font Awesome · 811 peers
You 89
·
Avg 76
+13 above average
0 50 100
Security P98SEO P95Accessibility P90Content P90Performance P88Sustainability P86Compliance P84Infrastructure P71
Better than 98% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →

Technology stack

Font Awesome, on LiteSpeed/Turbopack, hosted on Next.js, with Cloudflare CDN

16 technologies detected 6 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
WooCommerce
Framework
Font Awesome Framer Motion GSAP HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints React Tailwind CSS Webpack
Runtime
Turbopack
Server
LiteSpeed
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Next.js 16.3.7 Next.js App Router

All Detected Technologies (16)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://www.webtechnepal.com/_next/static/chunks/23h_ek8mpvkkr.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web servers Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app Detected by BeaverCheck

Turbopack is an incremental bundler for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust and integrated into the Next.js framework for optimized build performance.

Categories Development Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/turbopack Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Ecommerce Website https://woocommerce.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Body: woocommerce class/marker present

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://motion.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 267 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webtechnepal.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/webtechnepal.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/webtechnepal.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webtechnepal.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webtechnepal.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 18h total → projected A (94)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → A (90)
  • · 4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (92)
  • · 15 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
  • · 65 inline style attribute(s) detected

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (94)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback