Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Page weighs 6.7 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,170 investment → €6,864/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 23.3s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 20.8s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 500ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundDSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.862 /mo
+31.2pp bounce · ~3,119 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€1,13 /mo
15227.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page loadSaves €1,13/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
5.70 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
23.30 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
500 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.338
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
10.95 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
23.64 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.66 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.69 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
9 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.084
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.11 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.76 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 6.7 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
1 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Babel, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
Etracker 
Babel 
Backbone.js 1.2.3
Bootstrap 3.4.1HSTS 
Lodash 1.8.3
Modernizr 3.13.0
Open Graph 
core-js 2.5.0
jQuery 2.2.2
jQuery UI 1.11.4
Apache Apache HTTP Server All Detected Technologies (13)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Babel is a free and open-source transcompiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
BackboneJS is a JavaScript library that allows to develop and structure the client side applications that run in a web browser.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.
Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
Etracker is a web optimisation solution.
Observations (4)
No build tool detected
A framework (Babel) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Bootstrap version may be outdated
Detected Bootstrap 3.4.1. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 2.2.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/f1bc6fb6-bc04-4afb-9a03-56f6ee84a08b)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f1bc6fb6-bc04-4afb-9a03-56f6ee84a08b"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsachsen.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsachsen.deExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (84)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 6.7 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
- · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+5Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source