Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-20 20:04 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
24.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 613ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (144ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1263ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
169ms
DNS 44ms · TLS 68ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
144ms
DNS 27ms · TLS 65ms
United Stated - New York
447ms
DNS 155ms · TLS 120ms
United States - Santa Clara
788ms
DNS 300ms · TLS 185ms
Singapore - Singapore
866ms
DNS 325ms · TLS 205ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1263ms
DNS 417ms · TLS 304ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 613ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

it-wars.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page body has only 160 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 4

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€653 investment → €3,377/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€653
8.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€3.377
€40.519/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6102% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5200.2 mo payback · +7692% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€53 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~15%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+15pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€653 8.2 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€53 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.377 / month at risk ~€40.519 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

RGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.377 /mo

+15.3pp bounce · ~1,535 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,01 /mo

104.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~10 KB per page load
    Saves €0,01/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 81.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2853 peers
You 84
·
Avg 76
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Performance P96Accessibility P84Security P81SEO P20Sustainability P77Content P33Infrastructure P56

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 87% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1827 peers
You 84
·
Avg 77
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Performance P95Security P80Accessibility P80SEO P24Content P37Sustainability P63Infrastructure P48

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 84% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, on Caddy/Go, hosted on OVH

5 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS HTTP/3
Runtime
Go
Server
Caddy
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (5)

Caddy is a Go-based web server known for its simplicity and automatic HTTPS features.

Categories Web servers Website https://caddyserver.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Caddy
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: dns13.ovh.net

Go is an open source high-level programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://go.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FIt-wars.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/it-wars.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/it-wars.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FIt-wars.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FIt-wars.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Page body has only 160 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → A (92)
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback