Skip to content
https://www.studiolegalenoviligure.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-10-14 17:38 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 498ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (98ms), slowest from Singapore (1041ms). Assets on AWS CloudFront (host iol-website.italiaonline.it, 10 assets); document served directly from origin. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
957ms
DNS 600ms · TLS 228ms
Spain - Madrid
169ms
DNS 88ms · TLS 53ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
98ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 26ms
United States - Santa Clara
515ms
DNS 324ms · TLS 121ms
United Stated - New York
211ms
DNS 177ms · TLS 17ms
Singapore - Singapore
1041ms
DNS 549ms · TLS 326ms
CDN: AWS CloudFront (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 498ms · Cache: no-cache, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

studiolegalenoviligure.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

4 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 3

6 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 4

3 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 5

4 `@font-face` rule(s) without `font-display` -- causes FOIT

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€574 investment → €9,827/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€574
6.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€9.827
€117.920/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20452% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€383 → 0.0 mo payback · +30729% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
8
3 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
55
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€574 6.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.399 / month at risk ~€76.793 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 3 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.399 /mo

+32.6pp bounce · ~3,260 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.96

Bandwidth Waste

€0,19 /mo

2538.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~254 KB per page load
    Saves €0,19/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

46
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.79 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.86 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.40 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.104

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.66 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

11.29 s

Desktop

79
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

681 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.36 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

346 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.076

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.25 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.22 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

CMS · 2123 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Better than 84% of CMS sites
Italiaonline · 5 peers
You 81
·
Avg 79
At average
0 50 100
Better than 40% of Italiaonline sites See full Italiaonline benchmark →

Technology stack

Duda production_6839, with Nginx CDN

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
CMS
Duda production_6839 Italiaonline
Framework
Cookie Control Cookiebot 1 Cybot HSTS MobX Open Graph PhotoSwipe Priority Hints Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.18.1 jQuery 3.7.0 jQuery Migrate 3.5.2
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (17)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Duda is a user-friendly website builder and CMS platform that enables businesses and individuals to create responsive, mobile-friendly websites without extensive coding knowledge.

Categories CMS, Page builders Website https://www.duda.co Detected by BeaverCheck

Italiaonline is a web platform that provides tools and services for building and managing websites.

Categories Page builders Website https://www.italiaonline.it Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.civicuk.com/cookie-control Detected by BeaverCheck

Cookiebot is a cloud-driven solution that automatically controls cookies and trackers, enabling full GDPR/ePrivacy and CCPA compliance for websites.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.cookiebot.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Cybot is a tool that facilitates compliance with data privacy laws for website operators and marketers.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.cybot.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

PhotoSwipe is an open-source gallery to support JavaScript-based image zooming.

Categories Photo galleries, JavaScript libraries Website https://photoswipe.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 10 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-23LNSPS7Q6

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cookie Control) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studiolegalenoviligure.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/studiolegalenoviligure.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/studiolegalenoviligure.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studiolegalenoviligure.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.studiolegalenoviligure.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · 6 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 3 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · 4 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · 4 `@font-face` rule(s) without `font-display` -- causes FOIT

Send Feedback