Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 19:29 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
2.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$742 investment → $12,512/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$742
7.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$12,512
$150,149/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20145% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +23924% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
10
1 crit 9 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
63
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 242ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$742 7.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,335 / month at risk ~$100,015 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,334 /mo

+31.0pp bounce · ~3,098 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.24 /mo

3011.3 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~301 KB per page load
    Saves $0.24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

57
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.87 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.55 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

242 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.147

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.87 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.59 s

Desktop

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.36 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.58 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.294

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.37 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.58 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

dc.js · 70 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 64% of dc.js sites See full dc.js benchmark →
jQuery · 1857 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
SEO P2Performance P85Content P16Compliance P83Infrastructure P18Sustainability P77Security P64Accessibility P38

Top 10% of jQuery sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 62% of jQuery sites See full jQuery benchmark →

Technology stack

Priority Hints, with Cloudflare CDN

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics Oracle Infinity
Framework
Priority Hints ServiceNow TrustArc dc.js jQuery 3.6.1
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

TrustArc provides software and services to help corporations update their privacy management processes so they comply with government laws and best practices.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://trustarc.com Detected by BeaverCheck

A multi-dimensional charting library built to work natively with crossfilter and rendered using d3.js

Categories JavaScript graphics, JavaScript libraries Website https://dc-js.github.io/dc.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Oracle Infinity is a digital analytics platform for tracking, measuring, and optimizing the performance and visitor behavior of enterprise websites and mobile apps.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.oracle.com/cx/marketing/digital-intelligence/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Priority Hints) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjava.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/f48ebcc6-da17-4ee8-bf32-92dc465e9f04)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f48ebcc6-da17-4ee8-bf32-92dc465e9f04"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjava.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjava.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (84)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (79)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (84)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback