Skip to content
NO · NOK (kr) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: NOK 900/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-19 13:18 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 573ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (115ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1229ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
208ms
DNS 64ms · TLS 49ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
115ms
DNS 50ms · TLS 24ms
United Stated - New York
280ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 89ms
United States - Santa Clara
740ms
DNS 285ms · TLS 153ms
Singapore - Singapore
864ms
DNS 349ms · TLS 173ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1229ms
DNS 583ms · TLS 217ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 573ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Compliance, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 11.6 MB (6.0 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 39.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 39.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

NOK 6,525 investment → NOK 84,771/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
NOK 6.525
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
NOK 84.771
NOK 1.017.256/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15490% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
NOK 5.6250.1 mo payback · +17985% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
NOK 225 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 39.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 37.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 386ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

kr6,525 7.3 developer hours at kr900/hr
Quick wins
kr225 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

kr /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

NOK 84.771 / month at risk ~NOK 1.017.256 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

NOK 84.755 /mo

+33.9pp bounce · ~3,390 lost visitors/mo

CPC: NOK 25.00

Bandwidth Waste

NOK 16 /mo

18775.5 MB/mo × 0.860 NOK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.9 MB per page load
    Saves NOK 16/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

22
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

14.67 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

39.94 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

386 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.840

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

14.67 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

39.95 s

Desktop

62
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.40 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.42 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

6 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.116

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.80 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.85 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1570 peers
You 78
·
Avg 72
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P99Security P95Content P8Infrastructure P21Sustainability P31Performance P67SEO P39

Top 10% of core-js sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
Firebase Cloud Messaging · 28 peers
You 78
·
Avg 71
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 89% of Firebase Cloud Messaging sites See full Firebase Cloud Messaging benchmark →

Technology stack

Firebase Cloud Messaging, with Cloudflare CDN

19 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight Google Publisher Tag Google Tag Manager Prebid 8.52.2
Framework
Firebase Cloud Messaging Google Play app Google Search Console Google Workspace Microsoft Open Graph PWA Priority Hints Svelte Swiper Varnish core-js 3.10.2iOS app lit-html 3.1.4
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (19)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
Categories Framework Website https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Manifest gcm_sender_id is 103953800507 (Firebase default)
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest related_applications includes Google Play app
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=uYzpM0cqErDUHJrtGApiFCvUNHM2wMUI5_rC_pBJmxI
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms45623400

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Svelte is a free and open-source front end compiler created by Rich Harris and maintained by the Svelte core team members.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://svelte.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest related_applications includes iTunes/iOS app

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Advertising Website https://support.google.com/ds/answer/6029713?hl=en Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.

Categories Advertising Website https://developers.google.com/publisher-tag/guides/get-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://prebid.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Firebase Cloud Messaging) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

19 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbodonu.no)](https://beavercheck.com/results/f52a5ccd-89e9-4c5c-9eac-b3bd1adce55d)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f52a5ccd-89e9-4c5c-9eac-b3bd1adce55d"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbodonu.no" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbodonu.no

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (83)
  • · Page weighs 11.6 MB (6.0 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (87)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback