Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:06 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
4.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Performance and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽4,375 investment → ₽212,655/month returns

Investment
₽4 375
1.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽212 655
₽2 551 857/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+58228% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽2 6250.0 mo payback · +97114% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
6
3 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
61
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
0
Nav
0
  • Page takes 16.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 13.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 522ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽4,375 1.3 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽4,375 5 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽212 655 / month at risk ~₽2 551 857 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽212 604 /mo

+35.4pp bounce · ~3,543 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽51 /mo

6978.9 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~698 KB per page load
    Saves ₽51/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

26
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
75
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.11 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

16.31 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

522 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.373

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.46 s

Desktop

86
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
66
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

877 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.095

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.99 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.72 s

Categories

6
Avg score 71.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

DDoS-Guard · 9 peers
You 69
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 69
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Security P78Performance P24Infrastructure P74Compliance P47Sustainability P53

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 41 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 7% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

DDoS-Guard

3 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
DDoS-Guard Google Search Console Microsoft

All Detected Technologies (3)

DDoS-Guard is a Russian Internet infrastructure company which provides DDoS protection, content delivery network services, and web hosting services.

Categories Security Website https://ddos-guard.net Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=5INS8Ge0Y7thypxq6stbsZgKFFYVYQdNkCxmwqpRl0I
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=5AB030797CFF3628FAB704FA8754437B2FA08215

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (DDoS-Guard) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Faif.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/f5308f7e-9e47-409b-af25-a49878281672)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f5308f7e-9e47-409b-af25-a49878281672"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Faif.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Faif.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Cookie '__ddg10_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg1_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg8_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__ddg9_' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Send Feedback