Skip to content
https://lazada.sg Export & share
SG · SGD (S$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: PDPA Dev cost: S$ 90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:30 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

/.svn/entries is publicly accessible

Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.

Security › Information Leakage
Critical: 2

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

129 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

135 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

SGD 405 investment → SGD 11,278/month returns + SGD 1,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
SGD 405
4.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
SGD 11,278
SGD 135,332/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+33315% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided SGD 1,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
SGD 2250.0 mo payback · +60048% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
SGD 90 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

12 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~41%.

Barriers
12
4 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+41pp
added vs baseline
Score
36
F
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
3
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Page takes 5.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.1s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • 15 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

S$405 4.5 developer hours at S$90/hr
Quick wins
S$90 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

S$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

SGD 6,358 / month at risk ~SGD 76,299 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

SGD 1,000,000

PDPA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    PDPA: SGD 10,000 – SGD 1,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

SGD 6,357 /mo

+40.6pp bounce · ~4,056 lost visitors/mo

CPC: SGD 1.57

Bandwidth Waste

SGD 0.80 /mo

7444.4 MB/mo × 0.108 SGD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~744 KB per page load
    Saves SGD 0.80/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

40
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
41
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
58
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.63 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.02 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.10 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.107

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.01 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.37 s

Desktop

62
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
57
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.27 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.66 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

42 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.060

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.47 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.55 s

Categories

8
Avg score 67.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 554 peers
You 68
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Content P1Compliance P5Infrastructure P9Security P82SEO P60Performance P41Sustainability P43

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 73+ on Accessibility; you're at 37 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 4% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 68
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Content P1Compliance P3Infrastructure P8Security P87SEO P62Performance P47Sustainability P48

Top 10% of core-js sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 37 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 4% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Facebook, hosted on Tengine

11 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Facebook Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft MobX React 16.8.0 Swiper core-js 2.6.12 web-vitals
Hosting
Tengine

All Detected Technologies (11)

Tengine is a web server which is based on the Nginx HTTP server.

Categories Web servers Website https://tengine.taobao.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=h7bpbo3u46vmaah228h8xmanjgnd44
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=doDxDDq8i5e9MsChMF1fo4E6X6rrkMGQf6wfxeElphs

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms83096612
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://g.lazcdn.com/g/lzd/assets/1.2.13/??react/16.8.0/react.production.min.js,react-dom/16.8.0/react-dom.production.min.js, Script URL: https://g.lazcdn.com/g/lzd/assets/1.2.13/??react/16.8.0/react.production.min.js,react-dom/16.8.0/react-dom.production.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

The web-vitals JavaScript is a tiny, modular library for measuring all the web vitals metrics on real users.

Categories JavaScript libraries, RUM Website https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-vitals Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

React version may be outdated

Detected React 16.8.0. The current major version is 18. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flazada.sg)](https://beavercheck.com/results/f5f98857-4cc7-4a65-8d1c-8577630f92e7)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f5f98857-4cc7-4a65-8d1c-8577630f92e7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flazada.sg" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flazada.sg

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (75)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (71)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 129 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 4h → C (75)
  • · /.svn/entries is publicly accessible
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · 135 image(s) missing alt attribute

Send Feedback