Skip to content
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:59 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
37.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

14 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 2.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 2.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£563 investment → £3,126/month returns + GBP 17,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
£563
7.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£3,126
£37,514/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6569% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 17,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4880.2 mo payback · +7595% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£38 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~14%.

Barriers
4
4 warn
Bounce delta
+14pp
added vs baseline
Score
88
A
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
0
  • Page loads in 2.6s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 102ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£563 7.5 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£38 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£2,976 / month at risk ~£35,717 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£17,500,000

UK GDPR
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£2,976 /mo

+14.2pp bounce · ~1,417 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.04 /mo

578.7 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~58 KB per page load
    Saves £0.04/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.60 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

24 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.61 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

563 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

653 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

563 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

655 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 83.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 82
·
Avg 72
+10 above average
0 50 100
Performance P97Accessibility P90Sustainability P90Security P88Compliance P79Infrastructure P28SEO P57Content P45

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
core-js · 1582 peers
You 82
·
Avg 72
+10 above average
0 50 100
Performance P98Sustainability P89Security P88Accessibility P85Compliance P83Infrastructure P31Content P43SEO P49

Top 10% of core-js sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, on Ruby

11 technologies detected 2 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon Route 53 GOV.UK Frontend GOV.UK Template GOV.UK Toolkit Google Domains HSTS Open Graph Ruby on Rails Varnish core-js 3.36.0
Runtime
Ruby

All Detected Technologies (11)

Ruby is an open-source object-oriented programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://ruby-lang.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1080.awsdns-07.org
Categories UI frameworks Website https://design-system.service.gov.uk/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories UI frameworks Website https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_template/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories UI frameworks Website https://github.com/alphagov/govuk_frontend_toolkit Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Ruby on Rails is a server-side web application framework written in Ruby under the MIT License.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://rubyonrails.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservice.gov.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/results/f959c658-9cc4-450a-9447-64675d67a49f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/f959c658-9cc4-450a-9447-64675d67a49f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservice.gov.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fservice.gov.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (85)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 14 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback