Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance improving ↑
99
TTFB improving ↑
81ms
FCP improving ↑
1.7s
LCP improving ↑
1.8s
Scanned
2026-09-27 20:51 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
40.00s
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 351ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (81ms), slowest from Madrid (551ms). Netlify edge cache ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=stale; fwd-status=200; stored). 2 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
81ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
83ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 4ms
Spain - Madrid
551ms
DNS 46ms · TLS 33ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
488ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 11ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
404ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 7ms
Singapore - Singapore
501ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 165ms
CDN: Netlify ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=stale; fwd-status=200; stored) · Avg TTFB: 351ms · Cache: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

marriage10.netlify.app fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 3

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$642 investment → $3,486/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$642
6.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$3,486
$41,837/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6420% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$517 → 0.1 mo payback · +7997% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~13%.

Barriers
4
1 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+13pp
added vs baseline
Score
81
B
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$642 6.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,486 / month at risk ~$41,837 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,486 /mo

+13.0pp bounce · ~1,296 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.40 /mo

5015.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~502 KB per page load
    Saves $0.40/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.69 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.84 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.69 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.84 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

820 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

820 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

820 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

820 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 83.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Calendly · 20 peers
You 84
·
Avg 81
At average
0 50 100
Better than 40% of Calendly sites See full Calendly benchmark →
Google Font API · 1312 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Performance P92Accessibility P92Sustainability P92Compliance P16Security P82Content P24SEO P74Infrastructure P27

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Calendly, with Netlify CDN

7 technologies detected 2 stack layers Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Calendly Google Font API HSTS Open Graph Priority Hints
CDN
Netlify Netlify CDN

All Detected Technologies (7)

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify, Domain: .netlify.app
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M3JA5DHRYGT9YX32W48P9XJ8

Calendly is an app for scheduling appointments, meetings, and events.

Categories Appointment scheduling Website https://calendly.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Calendly) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarriage10.netlify.app)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/marriage10.netlify.app)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/marriage10.netlify.app"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarriage10.netlify.app" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarriage10.netlify.app

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback